Late yesterday afternoon, breaking news came out that the unidentified informant for the FBI on the uranium for Russian dollars issue was released from his non-disclosure agreement (DNA) by the Justice Department. All we know so far is the informant is a businessman who was involved in business dealings around a pay-for-play plan by Russia to acquire American uranium resources. We don't know if he turned evidence to avoid prosecution or he just found himself on the periphery of the action but, whatever his role, he wanted to get the story off of his back.
So, the real questions are just surfacing and they include these. How did he become aware of the situation and how and where will he testify? What evidence will he give and will he name names? Is his life in danger? Will he be afforded a security protection detail? And why after all the evidence came out and Congress and other entities became aware of what is happening did the FBI refuse to lift the DNA until forced to do so by the DOJ? I'm sure many more questions will surface in the near future and investigators start digging?
Had Hillary won the election, you can bet that this man would never have been allowed to tell his story and without it the corruption would just remain as an unproven matter. Regardless of who is involved, be it either party, when corruption over money and power rears its ugly head in the Swamp, nothing will come of the charges if the guilty remain running free. This needs to stop now.
Several House committees are interested in hearing from him as is the Senate Judiciary Committee, headed by Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley. Grassley applied direct pressure to the Justice Department to release the DNA and the work of Congressman Devin Nunes, Republican of California, led much of the upfront push to bring this subject to full view. They are to be congratulated since giving control of up to twenty-percent of our uranium to Russia has direct adverse implications to national security. America deserves to know the truth, including who all of the American players were, particularly those in government, and how much money was expended by Russian interests and accepted by American officials and for what purpose. Components of bribery, extortion, money laundering and even treason could very well play a role in the matter.
A lot of things that draw concerns and questions are coming to the front in a short period of time and Hillary Clinton seems to be involved in all of them. She assumed that her victory in last year's election would have allowed this matter to stay below the radar, but that was not to be. And what's even more amazing is that most of the issues involve Russia, a country that Hillary has tried to paint as a huge supporter of Donald Trump. The information which should soon be provided by this informant, like what is coming out on Trump's so-called Russian collusion, is clearly refuting her position.
Stay tuned. This should be a very interesting show. Maybe we should call it the "Glow in the Dark Scandal."
So, the real questions are just surfacing and they include these. How did he become aware of the situation and how and where will he testify? What evidence will he give and will he name names? Is his life in danger? Will he be afforded a security protection detail? And why after all the evidence came out and Congress and other entities became aware of what is happening did the FBI refuse to lift the DNA until forced to do so by the DOJ? I'm sure many more questions will surface in the near future and investigators start digging?
Had Hillary won the election, you can bet that this man would never have been allowed to tell his story and without it the corruption would just remain as an unproven matter. Regardless of who is involved, be it either party, when corruption over money and power rears its ugly head in the Swamp, nothing will come of the charges if the guilty remain running free. This needs to stop now.
Several House committees are interested in hearing from him as is the Senate Judiciary Committee, headed by Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley. Grassley applied direct pressure to the Justice Department to release the DNA and the work of Congressman Devin Nunes, Republican of California, led much of the upfront push to bring this subject to full view. They are to be congratulated since giving control of up to twenty-percent of our uranium to Russia has direct adverse implications to national security. America deserves to know the truth, including who all of the American players were, particularly those in government, and how much money was expended by Russian interests and accepted by American officials and for what purpose. Components of bribery, extortion, money laundering and even treason could very well play a role in the matter.
A lot of things that draw concerns and questions are coming to the front in a short period of time and Hillary Clinton seems to be involved in all of them. She assumed that her victory in last year's election would have allowed this matter to stay below the radar, but that was not to be. And what's even more amazing is that most of the issues involve Russia, a country that Hillary has tried to paint as a huge supporter of Donald Trump. The information which should soon be provided by this informant, like what is coming out on Trump's so-called Russian collusion, is clearly refuting her position.
Stay tuned. This should be a very interesting show. Maybe we should call it the "Glow in the Dark Scandal."
RSS Feed